rileyfl, maybe it was because you used the words, "dramatic" and "considerable" in describing the supposed changes. I can see how those words might be considered similar to the word, "significant". I certainly got the impression from what you wrote, that the supposed changes were "significant". Also, as a former research scientist, you are certainly aware that making these claims without proper testing makes the claims unreliable. I am surprised, considering your former occupation, that you would even make the claims at all. Not trying to be rough on you, but how does anyone really know what really happened? But, I will say, that if anyone read your initial claim, they might simply believe it, without any proof. They shouldn't simply believe it, and as a former scientist, you would certainly agree with that. But, people could get false information, or inaccurate information, if they simply believed everything they read. You understand, I'm sure. Again, not trying to be rough on you, but you could be "blowin' smoke" about this whole thing, or you could be absolutely genuine but inaccurate, or you could be both genuine and accurate. It's making the claim in a public forum that concerns me. Anyway, that's my 2 cents on it. [img]smile.gif[/img]
[ 10. January 2011, 08:19: Message edited by: delsarto ]
Drawing/Painting is the most fulfilling vocation to me. Nothing else even comes close.